JSB Books
Log in
The Collected Novels of Josè Saramago — Jose Saramago Defenders of the West: The Christian Heroes Who Stood Against Islam — Raymond Ibrahim The Devils — Joe Abercrombie Homo Deus — Yuval Noah Harari Martian Time-Slip — Philip K. Dick Newton and the Counterfeiter: The Unknown Detective Career of the World's Greatest Scientist — Thomas Levenson Red Sonja (2024) Vol. 3 The Master Falls (Red Sonja (Vol. 7)) — Torunn Grønbekk Red Sonja Vol. 1: His Master's Voice (Red Sonja (2023-)) — Torunn Grønbekk

← Previous 441–448 of 6,153 Next 8 → All 50 at a time

Cynical Theories

Helen Pluckrose · James A. Lindsay

2020 · Ebook · Pitchstone Publishing

Files: azw3, epub

Ebook

Have you heard that language is violence and that science is sexist? Have you read that certain people shouldn’t practice yoga or cook Chinese food? Or been told that being obese is healthy, that there is no such thing as biological sex, or that only white people can be racist? Are you confused by these ideas, and do you wonder how they have managed so quickly to challenge the very logic of Western society? In this probing and intrepid volume, Helen Pluckrose and James Lindsay document the evolution of the dogma behind these ideas, from its coarse origins in French postmodernism to its refinement within activist academic fields. Today this dogma is recognizable as much by its effects, such as cancel culture and social-media dogpiles, as by its tenets, which are all too often embraced as axiomatic in mainstream media: knowledge is a social construct; science and reason are tools of oppression; all human interactions are sites of oppressive power play; and language is dangerous. As Pluckrose and Lindsay warn, the unchecked proliferation of these anti-Enlightenment beliefs present a threat not only to liberal democracy but also to modernity itself. While acknowledging the need to challenge the complacency of those who think a just society has been fully achieved, Pluckrose and Lindsay break down how this often-radical activist scholarship does far more harm than good, not least to those marginalized communities it claims to champion. They also detail its alarmingly inconsistent and illiberal ethics. Only through a proper understanding of the evolution of these ideas, they conclude, can those who value science, reason, and consistently liberal ethics successfully challenge this harmful and authoritarian orthodoxy—in the academy, in culture, and beyond.